Best graphics cards in 2026: These are the GPUs worth spending money in right now
I've made a career out of prodding graphics cards and this has been the toughest set of recommendations I can remember.
Urgh. Graphics cards. Can't game without 'em, can't actually afford to buy them. It's tough right now because the best graphics card is, arguably, the one you can afford. The memory crisis has really done a number on this key component and our recommendations, too.
You might be swayed to upgrade by the VRAM debate, but our own testing shows that gaming with an 8 GB GPU is absolutely fine in most cases. To be clear, we prefer absolutely prefer more VRAM if possible, but cards with 16 GB of VRAM are preposterously expensive right now. Second-hand RTX 40-series or RX 7000-series cards are an option; providing you can find one.
I've tested pretty much every new graphics card that's been released in the past 10 years, and I believe that makes me well placed to talk you through what I think today's best graphics card is. That would be the Radeon RX 9070. But before we get to all the details, let me make it abundantly clear that the prices we're seeing today are nothing short of absurd. From the top to the bottom, they are inflated beyond belief. But if you need a card, you need a card; so here's what we recommend.
Dave first started as a PC hardware journalist, after years of freelance games journalism, way back in 2005 when he started with PC Format magazine. In that role, and many others since, he's tested pretty much every single graphics card generation and architecture released in the intervening years. He's the person best placed around PC Gamer to tell you which graphics card is the best right now, because he's used them all.
November 5, 2026: Everything hurts and I've had to make some tough decisions with our latest graphics card recommendations.
October 2, 2026: I've dropped in the latest best GPU pricing for the current generation, and it does not look pretty out there, folks 😢
August 21, 2026: I've added in a new review search box, so you can look back through the 100+ graphics card reviews my team and I have done over the years on PC Gamer. I have also added in the latest pricing information after the recent surge.
GPU price tracking
🕹️ RTX 5090: Unavailable from reputable sellers
🕹️ RTX 5080: $2,350 @ Walmart
🕹️ RTX 5070 Ti: $1,250 @ Best Buy
🕹️ RTX 5070: $890 @ Walmart
🕹️ RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB: $766 @ Best Buy
🕹️ RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB: $499 @ Walmart
🕹️ RTX 5060: $439 @ Walmart
🕹️ RTX 5050: $399 @ Walmart
🕹️ RX 9070 XT: $920 @ Amazon
🕹️ RX 9070: $747 @ Best Buy
🕹️ RX 9070 GRE: $650 @ Best Buy
🕹️ RX 9060 XT 16 GB: $650 @ Best Buy
🕹️ RX 9060 XT 8 GB: $460 @ Best Buy
🕹️ Arc B580: $350 @ Newegg
🕹️ Arc B570: $290 @ Newegg
Lowest price per GPU
We've been measuring the lowest available price of each current-gen GPU since August 14, 2025.
| Timestamp (Week) | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (Price, $) | AMD RX 9060 XT 16 GB (Price, $) | AMD RX 9060 XT 8 GB (Price, $) | AMD RX 9070 (Price, $) | AMD RX 9070 XT (Price, $) | Intel Arc B570 (Price, $) | Intel Arc B580 (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5050 (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5060 (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5070 (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti (Price, $) | Nvidia RTX 5080 (Price, $) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N/A | 370 | 280 | 600 | 700 | 230 | 260 | 250 | 300 | 430 | 368 | 550 | 780 | 1100 |
| 2 | N/A | 370 | 270 | 600 | 700 | 230 | 260 | 250 | 300 | 430 | 340 | 550 | 750 | 1099 |
| 3 | N/A | 370 | 280 | 550 | 700 | 230 | 250 | 250 | 291 | 430 | 370 | 524 | 750 | 1000 |
| 4 | N/A | 370 | 280 | 550 | 695 | 230 | 250 | 250 | 296 | 430 | 345 | 546 | 750 | 1000 |
| 5 | N/A | 350 | 270 | 600 | 670 | 230 | 250 | 250 | 300 | 430 | 340 | 481 | 749 | 1000 |
| 6 | N/A | 350 | 270 | 600 | 670 | 230 | 250 | 240 | 289 | 379 | 340 | 499 | 749 | 929 |
| 7 | N/A | 350 | 270 | 550 | 650 | 230 | 250 | 240 | 299 | 430 | 350 | 520 | 750 | 999 |
| 8 | N/A | 350 | 270 | 550 | 650 | 200 | 250 | 250 | 299 | 430 | 342 | 500 | 749 | 980 |
| 9 | N/A | 350 | 270 | 560 | 650 | 220 | 250 | 250 | 299 | 430 | 323 | 500 | 750 | 999 |
| 10 | N/A | 360 | 270 | 550 | 600 | 210 | 250 | 250 | 299 | 430 | 340 | 480 | 730 | 989 |
| 11 | N/A | 340 | 250 | 550 | 600 | 200 | 250 | 230 | 280 | 400 | 320 | 489 | 699 | 990 |
| 12 | N/A | 350 | 275 | 530 | 600 | 200 | 250 | 220 | 279 | 400 | 320 | 500 | 730 | 989 |
| 13 | N/A | 350 | 280 | 530 | 600 | 200 | 250 | 220 | 279 | 420 | 342 | 527 | 750 | 1000 |
| 14 | N/A | 370 | 280 | 530 | 600 | 202 | 250 | 220 | 279 | 420 | 313 | 540 | 750 | 1000 |
| 15 | N/A | 380 | 288 | 530 | 600 | 202 | 240 | 200 | 279 | 430 | 350 | 499 | 749 | 1000 |
| 16 | N/A | 380 | 288 | 530 | 620 | 202 | 240 | 200 | 270 | 430 | 350 | 499 | 750 | 1100 |
| 17 | N/A | 390 | 310 | 580 | 660 | 200 | 250 | 235 | 260 | 430 | 330 | 549 | 750 | 1230 |
| 18 | N/A | 390 | 310 | 580 | 700 | 200 | 250 | 240 | 290 | 450 | 330 | 540 | 829 | 1268 |
| 19 | N/A | 400 | 310 | 580 | 720 | 200 | 260 | 240 | 299 | 450 | 330 | 549 | 899 | 1380 |
| 20 | N/A | 440 | 310 | 600 | 720 | 200 | 290 | 240 | 299 | 520 | 330 | 620 | 1000 | 1350 |
| 21 | N/A | 440 | 350 | 590 | 730 | 250 | 290 | 260 | 299 | 520 | 351 | 620 | 950 | 1365 |
| 22 | N/A | 400 | 346 | 630 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 260 | 299 | 520 | 360 | 620 | 950 | 1365 |
| 23 | N/A | 440 | 346 | 630 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 260 | 340 | 520 | 360 | 630 | 950 | 1290 |
| 24 | N/A | 440 | 346 | 620 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 260 | 340 | 520 | 360 | 625 | 950 | 1290 |
| 25 | N/A | 440 | 346 | 610 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 260 | 349 | 550 | 360 | 630 | 950 | 1250 |
| 26 | N/A | 440 | 340 | 610 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 290 | 349 | 550 | 360 | 604 | 950 | 1260 |
| 27 | N/A | 440 | 340 | 630 | 730 | 250 | 300 | 290 | 349 | 570 | 360 | 640 | 950 | 1290 |
| 28 | N/A | 440 | 346 | 620 | 720 | 250 | 290 | 290 | 349 | 515 | 390 | 630 | 900 | 1250 |
| 29 | N/A | 449 | 350 | 620 | 710 | 250 | 290 | 290 | 349 | 500 | 390 | 636 | 990 | 1290 |
| 30 | N/A | 440 | 350 | 620 | 710 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 330 | 500 | 390 | 630 | 990 | 1290 |
| 31 | N/A | 440 | 350 | 620 | 670 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 330 | 500 | 380 | 599 | 990 | 1290 |
| 32 | N/A | 430 | 360 | 620 | 710 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 310 | 515 | 380 | 599 | 990 | 1290 |
| 33 | N/A | 430 | 360 | 600 | 710 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 349 | 490 | 400 | 599 | 980 | 1290 |
| 34 | N/A | 440 | 360 | 620 | 710 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 349 | 550 | 380 | 599 | 980 | 1270 |
| 35 | N/A | 430 | 360 | 600 | 700 | 260 | 304 | 290 | 350 | 550 | 380 | 599 | 900 | 1290 |
| 36 | 550 | 440 | 360 | 600 | 700 | 260 | 300 | 290 | 340 | 550 | 370 | 599 | 980 | 1250 |
| 37 | 550 | 440 | 350 | 600 | 700 | 250 | 304 | 290 | 340 | 570 | 370 | 599 | 980 | 1250 |
| 38 | 550 | 440 | 350 | 600 | 700 | 250 | 304 | 290 | 340 | 570 | 370 | 599 | 980 | 1250 |
| 39 | 500 | 400 | 360 | 600 | 700 | 250 | 298 | 290 | 340 | 570 | 330 | 599 | 920 | 1250 |
| 40 | 500 | 430 | 360 | 600 | 700 | 260 | 291 | 290 | 340 | 565 | 330 | 599 | 955 | 1250 |
| 41 | 500 | 430 | 360 | 600 | 700 | 250 | 290 | 290 | 339 | 560 | 330 | 560 | 900 | 1250 |
| 42 | 550 | 450 | 360 | 635 | 690 | 260 | 290 | 290 | 350 | 570 | 380 | 550 | 950 | 1250 |
| 43 | 500 | 470 | 370 | 650 | 720 | 260 | 310 | 299 | 359 | 650 | 420 | 755 | 1030 | 1290 |
| 44 | 500 | 470 | 400 | 650 | 720 | 260 | 310 | 299 | N/A | 780 | 420 | 763 | 1088 | 1479 |
| 45 | 530 | 460 | 360 | 630 | 730 | 260 | 310 | 299 | 359 | 773 | 389 | 800 | 1150 | 1550 |
| 46 | 530 | 470 | 400 | 650 | 740 | 260 | 310 | 299 | 359 | 570 | 389 | 759 | 1150 | 1550 |
| 47 | 520 | 470 | 409 | 650 | 740 | 260 | 310 | 299 | 359 | 570 | 389 | 725 | 1150 | 1450 |
| 48 | 500 | 470 | 430 | 650 | 760 | 260 | 330 | N/A | 359 | 780 | 389 | 779 | 1150 | 1450 |
| 49 | 570 | 500 | 450 | 667 | 760 | 260 | 330 | 310 | 380 | 780 | 488 | 779 | 1150 | 1653 |
| 50 | 550 | 520 | 400 | 700 | 800 | 290 | 330 | 310 | 439 | 789 | 470 | 779 | 1150 | 1654 |
| 51 | 570 | 520 | 400 | 700 | 830 | 290 | 330 | 400 | N/A | 789 | 470 | 789 | 1200 | 1800 |
1. Best overall graphics card: AMD Radeon RX 9070
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
RX 9070 - 1440p gaming performance
Comparative testing of the RX 9070, RX 9070 XT, RTX 5070, and RTX 5070 Ti
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 73 Avg FPS, 64 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 82 Avg FPS, 73 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 68 Avg FPS, 60 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 79 Avg FPS, 69 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 43 Avg FPS, 36 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 52 Avg FPS, 43 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 45 Avg FPS, 36 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 58 Avg FPS, 46 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 90 Avg FPS, 67 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 105 Avg FPS, 66 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 78 Avg FPS, 60 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 102 Avg FPS, 79 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 104 Avg FPS, 62 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 111 Avg FPS, 62 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 112 Avg FPS, 64 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 118 Avg FPS, 61 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 107 Avg FPS, 74 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 120 Avg FPS, 54 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 100 Avg FPS, 68 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 120 Avg FPS, 85 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 | 74 Avg FPS, 53 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 XT | 84 Avg FPS, 44 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 64 Avg FPS, 42 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 78 Avg FPS, 38 1% Low FPS |
✅ You want a good 1440p GPU, and a great 1080p one: The RX 9070 is now a fantastic all-round graphics card. It can nail 1440p and 1080p resolutions at top settings, and can call on FSR and AMD's frame generation feature to give you a boost if you need it.
✅ You're happy to undervolt/overclock: With some easy tweaks in the AMD drivers you can boost the performance of the GPU to within a couple of percentage points of the RX 9070 and RTX 5070 Ti.
❌ You can find an RX 9070 XT for anything close to the same price: While you can overclock the non-XT card to get within 2% of the performance, prices being equal the XT card is a no-brainer.
🪛 The Radeon RX 9070 is an excellent graphics card if you're looking for high 1440p performance without the almost $1,000 price points of the competing Nvidia cards. With the market as it is, the AMD card is the best GPU for most PC gamers.
The RX 9070 is a rather agonising pick as the best graphics card around right now. This second-tier RDNA 4 GPU is not the most powerful GPU you can buy. Nor is it anywhere near MSRP right now—but that's true of any card right now. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 does, however, still earn my recommendation as an all-round excellent performer.
It's the one that I would suggest to my PC gaming friends if they come looking for a recommendation. The RX 9070 offers close to the performance of AMD's most powerful RDNA 4 GPU, packs in 16 GB of GDDR6, can be easily overclocked without demanding much more cooling or power, and handily outperforms Nvidia's RTX 5070.
I was relatively cool on the card in my initial review of the GPU, mainly because our first taste of it was a card that XFX hiked the price of out the gate, which made it more than a reference RX 9070 XT. As things have evened out, there are reliably cheaper RX 9070 cards around.
Yet I still haven't come to that conclusion lightly. My first thought was going to be recommending the cheaper RX 9060 XT, because it performs well, and pretty much offers performance parity with the more expensive Nvidia option. But it doesn't feel like a great recommendation for the best graphics card, and moreover the 16 GB version now costs as much as the RX 9070 GRE.
The Radeon RX 9070 XT, though, is a fantastic card and were it not for the ludicrous over-pricing of AMD's finest it would absolutely be my top pick. With an MSRP of $599 it would be an easy choice for its impressive performance out of the box, stunning under-volting frame rate bumps, and the excellent filip of the new FSR4 upscaler. But the cheapest you can get it for these days is veering on four-digits, with the RX 9070 almost a couple hundred less for very similar gaming performance, especially with some judicious undervolting.
In the end, the extra raster performance of the Radeon RX 9070 over the RTX 5070—and how close it can get to the more expensive RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT GPUs—makes it the best graphics card to buy right now for most PC gamers in dire need of a graphics card. If you don't need one right now, maybe wait for a price drop.
Click through to read our full AMD Radeon RX 9070 review.
2. Best budget graphics card: Intel Arc B570
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
2. Intel Arc B570
Our expert review:
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
Arc B570 - 1080p gaming performance
Comparative testing of the Arc B570, Arc B580, and RTX 5050.
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Arc B570 | 37 Avg FPS, 28 1% Low FPS |
| Arc B580 | 43 Avg FPS, 34 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5050 | 50 Avg FPS, 38 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Arc B570 | 0 Avg FPS, 0 1% Low FPS |
| Arc B580 | 39 Avg FPS, 32 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5050 | 32 Avg FPS, 23 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Arc B570 | 54 Avg FPS, 32 1% Low FPS |
| Arc B580 | 70 Avg FPS, 44 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5050 | 54 Avg FPS, 24 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Arc B570 | 73 Avg FPS, 46 1% Low FPS |
| Arc B580 | 86 Avg FPS, 56 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5050 | 65 Avg FPS, 43 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Arc B570 | 40 Avg FPS, 19 1% Low FPS |
| Arc B580 | 45 Avg FPS, 25 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5050 | 46 Avg FPS, 28 1% Low FPS |
✅ You are on a restrictive budget: At the moment, the cheapest new graphics card you can buy is the Arc B570. It's the only one currently available sub-$300, but might not be for long.
❌ You can find an Arc B580/RTX 5050 for a decent price: If you can stretch your budget, the Arc B580 comes with more VRAM and the RTX 5050 is a faster, more consistent card.
🪛 The Intel Arc B570 is the best budget graphics card at the moment, but only because every other card has been priced out of contention. It's the cheapest current-generation GPU around today by some margin.
Difficult GPU recommendations is kinda the theme for this graphics card tier list, and they don't come much tougher than the budget pick. In a world where GPU pricing has been trending ever higher since the memory crisis bit, and even prior to that with the pandemic and ethereum mining booms, it's hard going trying to find a really cheap graphics card that's still worth the money in 2026.
The Intel Arc B570 is once again our pick for a buyer on a budget. It had briefly been replaced by the RTX 5050, on account of the Nvidia card's faster performance and better stability, but that card is so overpriced these days, fuhgeddaboudit. Nope, we're back to the Arc B570 simply because it's the only card available below $300.
Even so, it's a much harder GPU to recommend. Its occasional driver issues (Cyberpunk 2077, for example, is still a bit of a mess) are pretty tough to justify when the price is far in excess of its MSRP.
You will have to lower graphics settings, use upscaling where possible, and game at 1080p to get the most out of this card. It usually is bottom of the pack in our testing, but it nevertheless kicks the pants off most iGPUs. Intel's XeSS upscaling is pretty great, and AMD's FSR also works on any card for expanded support in a range of games.
You're also getting more than 8 GB of RAM here, even if it is only 10 GB. That's a boon for the B570 that you won't find anywhere else. Any 12 GB and 16 GB card costs a whole lot more than this.
So, the B570. It's not the graphics card we'd like to be recommending, but it is the one we feel we have to in order to keep the spark of budget PC gaming alive. You can absolutely play modern games on this thing at respectable frame rates if you're smart about it, and that's what counts.
3. Best midrange graphics card: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB - 1440p gaming performance
Comparative testing of the RTX 5060 Ti, RTX 5060, RTX 5070, and RX 9060 XT
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 50 Avg FPS, 43 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 51 Avg FPS, 45 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 44 Avg FPS, 37 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 68 Avg FPS, 60 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 48 Avg FPS, 43 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 33 Avg FPS, 25 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 32 Avg FPS, 26 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 23 Avg FPS, 12 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 45 Avg FPS, 36 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 26 Avg FPS, 17 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 59 Avg FPS, 47 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 56 Avg FPS, 45 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 45 Avg FPS, 13 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 78 Avg FPS, 60 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 51 Avg FPS, 41 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 87 Avg FPS, 42 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 97 Avg FPS, 64 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 89 Avg FPS, 52 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 112 Avg FPS, 64 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 75 Avg FPS, 58 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 75 Avg FPS, 53 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 72 Avg FPS, 34 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 63 Avg FPS, 45 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 100 Avg FPS, 68 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 68 Avg FPS, 49 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB | 44 Avg FPS, 30 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | 51 Avg FPS, 32 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5060 | 41 Avg FPS, 21 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 | 64 Avg FPS, 42 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9060 XT 8 GB | 47 Avg FPS, 27 1% Low FPS |
✅ You don't have the budget for a card with more VRAM: Everyone wants more VRAM, but when you can't afford more than the standard 8 GB, the RTX 5060 Ti makes better use of that limited amount than AMD's competition in our testing.
❌ You could stretch to the RX 9070 GRE: Nvidia's is the best of a bad bunch, but the RX 9070 GRE is actually a good card with 12 GB of VRAM at its disposal. Only thing is, prices have very recently increasing a lot for the Radeon number.
🪛 The Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is not the card we asked for, but maybe it's the card we need in these dark times. It's a lot cheaper than the 16 GB variant, and it puts its 8 GB of VRAM to better use than the RX 9060 XT.
Here's another recommendation we're making due to the memory crisis, not because we really love this card all that much. Unfortunately, 16 GB versions of any card are beyond extortionate these days, which means we're stuck with the 8 GB options. Like this here RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB.
Up until very recently, I would have recommended the Radeon RX 9070 GRE in place of the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, due to its 12 GB of VRAM and top performance for near-enough its MSRP of $550. Unfortunately, it's at least $650 these days, which means it's $150 more than the current asking price of the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB. That's a real shame, but onto the card at hand.
The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB seems to do better with limited VRAM than the RX 9060 XT, which also comes in 16 GB and 8 GB variants. It is slower than the 16 GB version, but again, proposterous pricing. Rather, if you're going to stick with 8 GB for money's sake, best go for the 5060 Ti to make better use of it.
The RTX 5060 Ti smashes the RTX 5060 in some games, and usually beats it by a decent margin in others. Considering that card is only about $50-$60 less right now, we prefer the Ti option. It's not the graphics card we wish we were getting for $500 today, but it is better than the alternatives.
Click through to read our full Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB review.
4. Best high-end graphics card: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
RX 9070 XT - 1440p gaming performance
Comparative testing of the RX 9070 XT, RTX 5070 Ti, RTX 5080, and RX 9070.
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 82 Avg FPS, 73 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 73 Avg FPS, 64 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 79 Avg FPS, 69 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 95 Avg FPS, 83 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 52 Avg FPS, 43 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 43 Avg FPS, 36 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 58 Avg FPS, 46 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 71 Avg FPS, 57 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 105 Avg FPS, 66 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 90 Avg FPS, 67 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 102 Avg FPS, 79 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 124 Avg FPS, 82 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 111 Avg FPS, 62 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 104 Avg FPS, 62 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 118 Avg FPS, 61 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 126 Avg FPS, 61 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 120 Avg FPS, 54 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 107 Avg FPS, 74 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 120 Avg FPS, 85 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 151 Avg FPS, 96 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| RX 9070 XT | 84 Avg FPS, 44 1% Low FPS |
| RX 9070 | 74 Avg FPS, 53 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5070 Ti | 78 Avg FPS, 38 1% Low FPS |
| RTX 5080 | 95 Avg FPS, 59 1% Low FPS |
✅ You are happy to tweak: This generation has seen an impressive level of headroom built into its GPUs. For AMD that means undervolting, but it means you can get some serious extra performance out of the chip without putting any extra strain on either the power demands or cooling solution.
✅ You were considering the RTX 5070 Ti: The RX 9070 XT gets so close to the RTX 5070 Ti's performance, especially when undervolted, that you can easily forget there's a huge price difference between them now.
❌ The price goes much higher: At a certain point, the high-end cards are priced out of all contention. Like the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080, which are just ludicrous money today. The RTX 5070 Ti is getting there, too, with the RX 9070 XT just behind it.
🪛 The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the best high-end graphics card you can buy right now. I was super keen on the RTX 5070 Ti when it was priced more sensibly. But with a massive price difference between them, and the RX 9070 XT able to deliver almost the same levels of performance, the smart money should be going to AMD.
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the best high-end graphics card you can buy today, though obviously we're stretching mightily by a graphics card that is now regularly retailing for just under $1000. But where once it was a straight fight between it and the Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti for the title, the current pricing issues have put AMD's option well into the lead.
Nvidia GPUs, for various reasons, have been more noticeably affected by the price hikes than AMD cards. And here that manifests as an almost $300 price difference between the two once-similarly priced GPUs. Honestly, only a fool would pay that sort of premium for the GeForce card unless you really must have Nvidia's features or AI performance.
The actual gaming performance delta really isn't that great. You can look at the benchmark numbers up there 👆 and see just how close they are. Most especially when you take overclocking into account.
Both AMD and Nvidia chips of this generation have an impressive amount of headroom baked into them, accessed in different ways, but both able to deliver a good chunk of extra performance for the eager tweaker. And it's not hard to do either. With the RX 9070 XT it's a case of undervolting the GPU, and thereby giving it some thermal headroom to unlock higher clock speeds and therefore higher frame rates.
And you get all that without increasing the power or thermal demands on the card all that much, either. It really is genuinely and truly worth doing for anyone with an RDNA 4 card in their gaming PC. Free frames, people.
One other thing the RDNA 4 generation of Radeon GPUs brought with it was FSR 4. More than just an iterative improvement of AMD's upscaling tech, FSR 4 represents a fundamental change in how its graphics cards approach the problem, bringing them more in line with how Nvidia does it. That means it's taking a machine learning approach for the first time, and is delivering genuinely impressive levels of image and motion clarity for cards like the RX 9070 XT.
The only slight fly in the ointment is the fact the RX 9070 is a good bit cheaper than the RX 9070 XT and is pretty performant in its own right. It's not quite as quick, but it's impressive enough to be our overall pick as best GPU right now.
Click through to read our full AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT review.
How we test graphics cards
I have been benchmarking graphics cards since the 2000s, and have used many different games, applications, and methodologies over the intervening years. And, for the most part, testing GPUs is a largely objective process; you test the silicon in different ways, come out with a set of benchmark figures which you then compare against another set of numbers from a different card, or cards, to be able to objectively tell which is empirically the best.
Our current GPU test suite consists of Black Myth Wukong, Cyberpunk 2077, F1 24, Homeworld 3, Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, The Talos Principle 2, andTotal War: Warhammer III for our gaming tests. These tests are carried out using the same game and system settings across all the graphics cards we test, and are run at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions.
We measure using both the average frame rate and the 1% Low FPS figure. This gives us a general measure of in-game performance as well as allowing us to see just how consistent that frame rate level is. The 1% Low FPS measure shows the average of the highest 1% of frame times in any given benchmarking run. Translating that into frames per second (1000/x ms) gives us the data to show whether there are regularly large drops in performance or whether it's relatively stable.
We capture this data using the Nvidia Frameview app running over the top of whatever game we are benchmarking, whether the game will give its own data output or not.
We also use the UL suite of benchmark software to get some synthetic testing done against high-end rastererisation performance with 3DMark Time Spy Extreme, and ray tracing performance with 3DMark Port Royal.
With the new RTX Blackwell cards, we've also been using a selection of games to help us get a bead on the impact of Multi Frame Generation on both frame rate and PC latency, too. As well as retesting different levels of MFG (at either 1440p for lower end cards or 4K for high-end GPUs) with Cyberpunk 2077, we also use the ultra-demanding Alan Wake 2 and Dragon Age: Veilguard for its implementation via the Nvidia App.
Actual gaming performance isn't the whole story with graphics cards, however, as they are used for different uses outside of gaming. While we are PC Gamer, we know that some people want to be able to use their PC for 3D rendering, editing, or generative AI uses, and so we run the Blender benchmark, PugetBench for DaVinci Resolve, and Procyon's image generation benchmark using StableDiffusion.
We also capture a ton of system data, too, using the Nvidia PCAT tool (a riser board which sits between the GPU and PCIe slot) to measure actual graphics card power draw. This means we can track both peak and average power use when gaming, and a given GPU's performance per Watt metrics, too.
For this we use three back-to-back runs of the Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition benchmark, at 1080p and 4K, to give us the power numbers, as well as peak and average temperatures and average GPU clock speed, too.
On top of this we will also test the overclocking capabilities of graphics cards, by pushing them as far as we can using standard overclocking methodologies; ie. the same as you would be able to easily do at home. No LN2 sniffing going on here.
But there are also subjective measures which come into play when actually picking the best graphics card. And that all comes down to a consistent driver experience when using the GPU, how loud the cooling fans can get, whether there is discomforting coil whine or other electrical noise, and just how much damned money manufacturers are charging for these cards.
In short, there's a lot that goes into our testing.
In the PC Gamer office—and sometimes my own satellite office up the hill if I'm testing into the wee hours of the morning—we have a dedicated test rig that we use for testing graphics cards. This is our AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-based system:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Motherboard: Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master | RAM: G.Skill 32 GB DDR5-6000 CAS 30 | Cooler: Corsair H170i Elite Capellix | SSD: 2 TB Crucial T700 | PSU: Seasonic Prime TX 1600W | Case: DimasTech Mini V2
We also have two other systems, kindly provided by MSI and CyberpowerPC, which we use if another member of the team, such as Jacob, Nick, or Andy, need to benchmark a card. These travel around the UK, and both house the same set of components so we can maintain multiple testing PCs which deliver data we can use to accurate reference other cards.
GPU hierarchy
Below we have listed multiple generations of graphics card based on a simple 3DMark Time Spy Extreme GPU index score. This is only a rough approximation of relative gaming performance between the different graphics cards, as there is more variance than just with a single synthetic benchmark, but it is still a good snap shot of where the cards stack up against each other.
Rank |
Graphics card |
3DMark Time Spy Extreme score |
Header Cell - Column 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Nvidia RTX 5090 |
25206 |
Row 0 - Cell 3 |
2 |
Nvidia RTX 4090 |
19453 |
Row 1 - Cell 3 |
3 |
Nvidia RTX 5080 |
16252 |
Row 2 - Cell 3 |
4 |
AMD RX 9070 XT |
14315 |
Row 3 - Cell 3 |
5 |
Nvidia RTX 4080 Super |
14219 |
Row 4 - Cell 3 |
6 |
Nvidia RTX 4080 |
14067 |
Row 5 - Cell 3 |
7 |
Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti |
13534 |
Row 6 - Cell 3 |
8 |
AMD RX 7900 XTX |
12751 |
Row 7 - Cell 3 |
9 |
AMD RX 9070 |
12647 |
Row 8 - Cell 3 |
10 |
AMD RX 7900 XT |
12686 |
Row 9 - Cell 3 |
11 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super |
11887 |
Row 10 - Cell 3 |
12 |
Nvidia RTX 3090 Ti |
11249 |
Row 11 - Cell 3 |
13 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti |
10973 |
Row 12 - Cell 3 |
14 |
Nvidia RTX 5070 |
10670 |
Row 13 - Cell 3 |
15 |
Nvidia RTX 3090 |
10217 |
Row 14 - Cell 3 |
16 |
AMD RX 6950 XT |
10199 |
Row 15 - Cell 3 |
17 |
Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti |
9946 |
Row 16 - Cell 3 |
18 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 Super |
9890 |
Row 17 - Cell 3 |
19 |
AMD RX 6900 XT |
9003 |
Row 18 - Cell 3 |
20 |
AMD RX 7800 XT |
8953 |
Row 19 - Cell 3 |
21 |
Nvidia RTX 3080 10GB |
8692 |
Row 20 - Cell 3 |
22 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 |
8573 |
Row 21 - Cell 3 |
23 |
AMD RX 6800 XT |
8454 |
Row 22 - Cell 3 |
24 |
AMD RX 9060 XT |
7664 |
Row 23 - Cell 3 |
25 |
AMD RX 7700 XT |
7653 |
Row 24 - Cell 3 |
26 |
Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti |
7281 |
Row 25 - Cell 3 |
27 |
Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti |
7261 |
Row 26 - Cell 3 |
28 |
AMD RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
7229 |
Row 27 - Cell 3 |
29 |
AMD RX 6800 |
7095 |
Row 28 - Cell 3 |
30 |
AMD RX 9060 XT 8 GB |
6944 |
Row 29 - Cell 3 |
31 |
Intel Arc B580 |
6849 |
Row 30 - Cell 3 |
32 |
Nvidia RTX 3070 |
6803 |
Row 31 - Cell 3 |
33 |
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti |
6422 |
Row 32 - Cell 3 |
34 |
Nvidia RTX 5060 |
6379 |
Row 33 - Cell 3 |
35 |
AMD RX 6750 XT |
6341 |
Row 34 - Cell 3 |
36 |
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti |
6296 |
Row 35 - Cell 3 |
37 |
AMD RX 6700 XT |
5879 |
Row 36 - Cell 3 |
38 |
Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti |
5841 |
Row 37 - Cell 3 |
39 |
Intel Arc B570 |
5790 |
Row 38 - Cell 3 |
40 |
Nvidia RTX 2080 Super |
5360 |
Row 39 - Cell 3 |
41 |
AMD RX 6700 |
5146 |
Row 40 - Cell 3 |
42 |
AMD RX 7600 |
4993 |
Row 41 - Cell 3 |
43 |
Nvidia RTX 5050 |
4949 |
Row 42 - Cell 3 |
44 |
Nvidia RTX 4060 |
4930 |
Row 43 - Cell 3 |
45 |
AMD RX 6650 XT |
4743 |
Row 44 - Cell 3 |
46 |
AMD RX 6600 XT |
4310 |
Row 45 - Cell 3 |
47 |
AMD RX 5700 XT |
4217 |
Row 46 - Cell 3 |
48 |
Nvidia RTX 3060 |
3961 |
Row 47 - Cell 3 |
49 |
AMD RX 6600 |
3719 |
Row 48 - Cell 3 |
50 |
Nvidia RTX 2060 |
3346 |
Row 49 - Cell 3 |
51 |
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti |
2887 |
Row 50 - Cell 3 |
52 |
Nvidia GTX 1660 Super |
2812 |
Row 51 - Cell 3 |
53 |
Nvidia RTX 3050 |
2743 |
Row 52 - Cell 3 |
54 |
Nvidia GTX 1660 |
2466 |
Row 53 - Cell 3 |
55 |
AMD RX 6500 XT |
2287 |
Row 54 - Cell 3 |
56 |
AMD RX 5500 XT |
2267 |
Row 55 - Cell 3 |
57 |
Nvidia GTX 1650 Super |
2071 |
Row 56 - Cell 3 |
58 |
Nvidia GTX 1650 |
1594 |
Row 57 - Cell 3 |
Nvidia GPU specs
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Memory size (GB) |
Die size (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM count |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Boost clock (MHz) |
Memory type |
Memory bus width (bits) |
Memory bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 5050 |
$249 |
Jul 16, 2025 |
GB207-300 |
TSMC 4N |
2560 |
8 |
121 |
15.1 |
20 |
80 |
32 |
80 |
20 |
32 |
2572 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
320 |
130 |
RTX 5060 |
$299 |
May, 19, 2025 |
GB206-250 |
TSMC 4N |
3840 |
8 |
181 |
21.9 |
30 |
120 |
48 |
120 |
30 |
32 |
2497 |
GDDR7 |
128 |
448 |
145 |
RTX 5060 Ti |
$379 / $429 |
Apr, 16, 2025 |
GB205-300 |
TSMC 4N |
4608 |
8 / 16 |
181 |
21.9 |
36 |
144 |
48 |
144 |
36 |
32 |
2572 |
GDDR7 |
128 |
448 |
180 |
RTX 5070 |
$549 |
Mar 5, 2025 |
GB205-300 |
TSMC 4N |
6144 |
12 |
263 |
31.1 |
48 |
192 |
80 |
192 |
48 |
48 |
2512 |
GDDR7 |
192 |
672 |
250 |
RTX 5070 Ti |
$749 |
Feb 20, 2025 |
GB203-300 |
TSMC 4N |
8960 |
16 |
378 |
45.6 |
70 |
280 |
96 |
280 |
70 |
64 |
2452 |
GDDR7 |
256 |
896 |
300 |
RTX 5080 |
$999 |
Feb 20, 2025 |
GB203-400 |
TSMC 4N |
10752 |
16 |
378 |
45.6 |
84 |
336 |
112 |
336 |
84 |
64 |
2617 |
GDDR7 |
256 |
960 |
360 |
RTX 5090 |
$1999 |
Jan 30, 2025 |
GB202-300 |
TSMC 4N |
21760 |
32 |
750 |
92.2 |
170 |
680 |
176 |
680 |
170 |
96 |
2407 |
GDDR7 |
512 |
1792 |
575 |
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Memory size (GB) |
Die size (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM count |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Boost clock (MHz) |
Memory type |
Memory bus width (bits) |
Memory bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 4060 |
$299 |
Jun 29, 2023 |
AD107-400 |
TSMC 4N |
3072 |
8 |
159 |
18.9 |
24 |
96 |
32 |
96 |
24 |
24 |
2460 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
272 |
115 |
RTX 4060 Ti |
$399 |
May 24, 2023 |
AD106-350 |
TSMC 4N |
4352 |
8 |
188 |
22.9 |
34 |
136 |
48 |
136 |
34 |
32 |
2535 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
288 |
160 |
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
$499 |
Jul 18, 2023 |
AD106-351 |
TSMC 4N |
4352 |
16 |
188 |
22.9 |
34 |
136 |
48 |
136 |
34 |
32 |
2535 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
288 |
165 |
RTX 4070 |
$599 |
Apr 13, 2023 |
AD104-250 |
TSMC 4N |
5888 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
46 |
184 |
64 |
184 |
46 |
36 |
2475 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
200 |
RTX 4070 Super |
$599 |
Jan 17, 2024 |
AD104-350 |
TSMC 4N |
7168 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
56 |
224 |
80 |
224 |
56 |
48 |
2475 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
220 |
RTX 4070 Ti |
$799 |
Jan 5, 2023 |
AD104-400 |
TSMC 4N |
7680 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
60 |
240 |
80 |
240 |
60 |
48 |
2610 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
285 |
RTX 4070 Ti Super |
$799 |
Jan 24, 2024 |
AD103-275 |
TSMC 4N |
8448 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
66 |
264 |
96 |
264 |
66 |
48 |
2610 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
672 |
285 |
RTX 4080 |
$1199 |
Nov 16, 2022 |
AD103-300 |
TSMC 4N |
9728 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
76 |
304 |
112 |
304 |
76 |
64 |
2505 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
716.8 |
320 |
RTX 4080 Super |
$999 |
Jan 31, 2024 |
AD103-400 |
TSMC 4N |
10240 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
80 |
320 |
112 |
320 |
80 |
64 |
2550 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
736 |
320 |
RTX 4090 |
$1599 |
Oct 12, 2022 |
AD102-300 |
TSMC 4N |
16384 |
24 |
608.5 |
76.3 |
128 |
512 |
176 |
512 |
128 |
72 |
2520 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
1008 |
450 |
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Memory size (GB) |
Die size (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM count |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Boost clock (MHz) |
Memory type |
Memory bus width (bits) |
Memory bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 3050 |
$169 / $249 |
Jan 27, 2022 |
GA106-150 |
Samsung 8nm |
2560 |
6 / 8 |
276 |
12 |
20 |
80 |
32 |
80 |
20 |
2 |
1777 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
168 / 224 |
130 |
RTX 3060 |
$329 |
Feb 25, 2021 |
GA106-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
3584 |
8 / 12 |
276 |
12 |
28 |
112 |
48 |
112 |
28 |
3 |
1777 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
240 / 360 |
170 |
RTX 3060 Ti |
$399 |
Dec 1, 2020 |
GA104-200 |
Samsung 8nm |
4864 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
38 |
152 |
80 |
152 |
38 |
4 |
1665 |
GDDR6/X |
256 |
448 / 608 |
200 |
RTX 3070 |
$499 |
Oct 29, 2020 |
GA104-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
5888 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
46 |
184 |
96 |
184 |
46 |
4 |
1725 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
220 |
RTX 3070 Ti |
$599 |
Jun 10, 2021 |
GA104-400 |
Samsung 8nm |
6144 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
48 |
192 |
96 |
192 |
48 |
4 |
1770 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
608.3 |
290 |
RTX 3080 |
$699 |
Sep 17, 2020 |
GA102-200 |
Samsung 8nm |
8704 |
10 |
628 |
28.3 |
68 |
272 |
96 |
272 |
68 |
5 |
1710 |
GDDR6X |
320 |
760.3 |
320 |
RTX 3080 12 GB |
$799 |
Jan 11, 2022 |
GA102-220 |
Samsung 8nm |
8960 |
12 |
628 |
28.3 |
70 |
280 |
96 |
280 |
70 |
5 |
1710 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
912.4 |
350 |
RTX 3080 Ti |
$1199 |
Jun 3, 2021 |
GA102-225 |
Samsung 8nm |
10240 |
12 |
628 |
28.3 |
80 |
320 |
112 |
320 |
80 |
6 |
1665 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
912.4 |
350 |
RTX 3090 |
$1499 |
Sep 24, 2020 |
GA102-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
10496 |
24 |
628 |
28.3 |
82 |
328 |
112 |
328 |
82 |
6 |
1695 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
936.2 |
350 |
RTX 3090 Ti |
$1999 |
Mar 29, 2022 |
GA102-350 |
Samsung 8nm |
10752 |
24 |
628 |
28.3 |
84 |
336 |
112 |
336 |
84 |
6 |
1860 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
1008 |
450 |
| Row 10 - Cell 0 | Row 10 - Cell 1 | Row 10 - Cell 2 | Row 10 - Cell 3 | Row 10 - Cell 4 | Row 10 - Cell 5 | Row 10 - Cell 6 | Row 10 - Cell 7 | Row 10 - Cell 8 | Row 10 - Cell 9 | Row 10 - Cell 10 | Row 10 - Cell 11 | Row 10 - Cell 12 | Row 10 - Cell 13 | Row 10 - Cell 14 | Row 10 - Cell 15 | Row 10 - Cell 16 | Row 10 - Cell 17 | Row 10 - Cell 18 | Row 10 - Cell 19 |
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Memory size (GB) |
Die size (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM count |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Boost clock (MHz) |
Memory type |
Memory bus width (bits) |
Memory bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 2060 |
$299 / $349 |
Jan 15, 2019 |
TU106-200 / TU106-300 / TU104-150 |
TSMC 12 nm |
1920 / 2176 |
6 / 12 |
445 / 545 |
10.8 / 13.6 |
30 / 34 |
120 / 136 |
48 / 64 |
240 / 272 |
30 / 34 |
3 |
1650 / 1680 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
336 |
160 / 185 |
RTX 2060 Super |
$399 |
Jul 9, 2019 |
TU106-410 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2176 |
8 |
445 |
10.8 |
34 |
136 |
64 |
272 |
34 |
4 |
1650 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
175 |
RTX 2070 |
$499 |
Oct 17, 2019 |
TU106-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2304 |
8 |
445 |
10.8 |
36 |
144 |
64 |
288 |
36 |
4 |
1620 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
175 |
RTX 2070 Super |
$499 |
Jul 9, 2019 |
TU104-410 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2560 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
40 |
160 |
64 |
320 |
40 |
4 |
1770 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
215 |
RTX 2080 |
$699 |
Sep 20, 2018 |
TU104-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2944 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
46 |
184 |
64 |
368 |
46 |
4 |
1710 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
215 |
RTX 2080 Super |
$699 |
Jul 23, 20190 |
TU104-450 |
TSMC 12 nm |
3072 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
48 |
192 |
64 |
384 |
48 |
4 |
1815 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
499.2 |
250 |
RTX 2080 Ti |
$999 |
Sep 20, 2018 |
TU102-300 |
TSMC 12 nm |
4352 |
11 |
754 |
18.6 |
68 |
272 |
88 |
544 |
68 |
5.5 |
1545 |
GDDR6 |
352 |
616 |
250 |
Titan RTX |
$2499 |
Dec 18, 2018 |
TU102-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
4608 |
24 |
754 |
18.6 |
72 |
288 |
96 |
576 |
72 |
6 |
1770 |
GDDR6 |
384 |
672 |
280 |
AMD GPU specs
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Compute Units (CUs) |
Memory Size (GB) |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Size (mm²) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Ray Accelerators |
AI Accelerators |
Memory Type |
Memory bus |
TBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 9060 XT |
$269 |
May 25, 2023 |
Navi 44 |
32 |
8 / 16 |
TSMC N4P |
29.7 |
199 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
32 |
64 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
150 / 160 |
RX 9070 GRE |
$449 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 48 |
48 |
12 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
3072 |
192 |
96 |
48 |
96 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
220 |
RX 9070 |
$499 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 48 |
56 |
16 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
3584 |
224 |
128 |
56 |
112 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
220 |
RX 9070 XT |
$899 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 48 |
64 |
16 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
4096 |
256 |
128 |
64 |
128 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
304 |
Model |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
Code Name |
Compute Units (CUs) |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Size (mm²) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Ray Accelerators |
AI Accelerators |
Memory Size (GB) |
Memory Type |
Memory Bus |
TBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 7600 |
$269 |
May 25, 2023 |
Navi 33 |
32 |
6nm |
13.3 |
204 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
32 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
165 |
RX 7700 XT |
$449 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 32 |
54 |
5nm |
28.1 |
346 |
3456 |
216 |
96 |
54 |
108 |
12 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
245 |
RX 7800 XT |
$499 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 32 |
60 |
5nm |
28.1 |
346 |
3840 |
240 |
96 |
60 |
120 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
263 |
RX 7900 XT |
$899 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 31 |
84 |
5nm |
57.7 |
529 |
5376 |
336 |
192 |
84 |
168 |
20 |
GDDR6 |
320 |
315 |
RX 7900 XTX |
$999 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 31 |
96 |
5nm |
57.7 |
529 |
6144 |
384 |
192 |
96 |
192 |
24 |
GDDR6 |
384 |
355 |
Model |
Launch |
Code Name |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Size (mm²) |
Compute Units (CUs) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Memory Size (GB) |
Memory Type |
MSRP (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 6600 |
Oct 13, 2021 |
Navi 23 |
7nm |
11.06 |
237 |
28 |
1792 |
112 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$329 |
RX 6600 XT |
Aug 11, 2021 |
Navi 23 |
7nm |
11.06 |
237 |
32 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$379 |
RX 6700 XT |
Mar 18, 2021 |
Navi 22 |
7nm |
17.2 |
335 |
40 |
2560 |
160 |
64 |
12 |
GDDR6 |
$479 |
RX 6800 |
Nov 18, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
60 |
3840 |
240 |
96 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$579 |
RX 6800 XT |
Nov 18, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
72 |
4608 |
288 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$649 |
RX 6900 XT |
Dec 8, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
80 |
5120 |
320 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$999 |
RX 6950 XT |
May 10, 2022 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
80 |
5120 |
320 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$1099 |
Model |
Launch |
Code Name |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Size (mm²) |
Compute Units (CUs) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Memory Size (GB) |
Memory Type |
MSRP (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 5500 XT |
Dec 12, 2019 |
Navi 14 |
7nm |
6.4 |
158 |
22 |
1408 |
88 |
32 |
4/8 |
GDDR6 |
$169 |
RX 5600 XT |
Jan 21, 2020 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
36 |
2304 |
144 |
64 |
6 |
GDDR6 |
$279 |
RX 5700 |
Jul 7, 2019 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
36 |
2304 |
144 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$349 |
RX 5700 XT |
Jul 7, 2019 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
40 |
2560 |
160 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$399 |
The PC Gamer Circuit Breaker newsletter breaks down the latest PC gaming tech, and finds you the best deals on the best products
Dave has been gaming since the days of Zaxxon and Lady Bug on the Colecovision, and code books for the Commodore Vic 20 (Death Race 2000!). He built his first gaming PC at the tender age of 16, and finally finished bug-fixing the Cyrix-based system around a year later. When he dropped it out of the window. He first started writing for Official PlayStation Magazine and Xbox World many decades ago, then moved onto PC Format full-time, then PC Gamer, TechRadar, and T3 among others. Now he's back, writing about the nightmarish graphics card market, CPUs with more cores than sense, gaming laptops hotter than the sun, and SSDs more capacious than a Cybertruck.
- Jacob Ridley Managing Editor, Hardware
- Andy Edser Hardware Writer