This gaming PC isn't just the cheapest RTX 5080 rig I've seen in ages, it's also packing the best midrange processor around
$2,300 is a lot of money, of course, but you're getting a lot of PC here.
With Nvidia's second most powerful RTX 50-series graphics card and one of Intel's best processors in years, plus a nice pile of speedy DRAM, this gaming PC is a great all-rounder for gaming and content creation. Only the measly 1 TB storage spoils the fun.
Key specs: Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus | RTX 5080 | 32 GB DDR5-6000 | 1 TB SSD
Look, we all know that the RAMpocalypse has ruined things for PC gamers, forcing the prices of DDR5 memory kits, SSDs, and graphics cards into the realm of ridiculousness. There's nothing you or I can do about this, other than either riding out the storm and hoping things get better, or biting the bullet and handing over a lot more cash for a new gaming PC than you would have done 12 months ago.
If you're in the latter camp, you'll want to ensure you're not overspending, of course, and the best way to do that is to build a new rig from scratch yourself. That way, you can shop around and get the best prices on components. However, if you don't want to go through that process and want a shiny new gaming PC right now, then how about this RTX 5080 gaming for $2,300 at Newegg?
- Join us on WhatsApp for daily deals, direct to your phone.
Yes, that's a fierce amount of money, but believe it or not, that's actually the cheapest RTX 5080 prebuild I've seen for quite a while. How has this been made possible? In two specific areas: the central processor and the amount of storage it has.
The good news is that while the CPU isn't a Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the best gaming chip around, what you are getting is the best mid-range processor at the moment: the iGPU-less version of Intel's brilliant Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. For something that 'only' has six P-cores and 12 E-cores, it packs a serious punch, and not 'just for the money' either.
Gaming performance
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 118 Avg FPS, 93 1% Low FPS |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 99 Avg FPS, 74 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 112 Avg FPS, 76 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 99 Avg FPS, 59 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 109 Avg FPS, 67 1% Low FPS |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 86 Avg FPS, 59 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 146 Avg FPS, 76 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 94 Avg FPS, 56 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 98 Avg FPS, 56 1% Low FPS |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 72 Avg FPS, 27 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 117 Avg FPS, 55 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 91 Avg FPS, 49 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 145 Avg FPS, 79 1% Low FPS |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 140 Avg FPS, 80 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 148 Avg FPS, 91 1% Low FPS |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 146 Avg FPS, 77 1% Low FPS |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 19987 CPU index score, 17567 Overall index score |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 14817 CPU index score, 16855 Overall index score |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 16116 CPU index score, 17052 Overall index score |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 13239 CPU index score, 16437 Overall index score |
Pitched against AMD's X3D chip, Intel's refreshed Arrow Lake CPU is notably slower in some games, but it's easily on par in others. And because the total number of threads supported by the 250KF Plus is 18, it's no slouch when it comes to multicore content creation workloads, such as offline rendering, code compiling, and file packaging.
Content creation performance
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 138 Single-core index score, 1817 Multi-core index score |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 131 Single-core index score, 1455 Multi-core index score |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 133 Single-core index score, 1307 Multi-core index score |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 131 Single-core index score, 1148 Multi-core index score |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 132 |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 97 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 101 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 93 |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 147 Compressing (GIPS), 146 Decompressing (GIPS) |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 121 Compressing (GIPS), 113 Decompressing (GIPS) |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 132 Compressing (GIPS), 141 Decompressing (GIPS) |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 112 Compressing (GIPS), 131 Decompressing (GIPS) |
| Product | Value |
|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 101 |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | 85 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 92 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | 83 |
That makes this desktop PC a near-perfect all-rounder. You've got the might of a GeForce RTX 5080 for gaming and productivity, the punch of the 250KF Plus for all tasks, plus 32 GB of fast DDR5 to avoid memory worries.
The only thing that's genuinely disappointing here is the fact that you just get 1 TB of NVMe storage. In a $2,300 system. Yeah, the RAMpocalypse really does suck. Anyway, it's not clear what the exact make and model of motherboard is inside this system, but I'd be extremely surprised if it didn't have at least one more M.2 slot to throw in another SSD, when funds permit such an upgrade.
Now, if you do want this gaming PC with the same GPU, but a bigger SSD and a 9800X3D processor, then you're in luck, because Andromedia Insights has such a configuration for $2,800 at Newegg.
Is it worth $500 more than the one I've found? For some PC gamers, sure, but I'd prefer to keep the money and just enjoy this very neat-looking 250KF+5080 combo.
👉Check out all of Newegg's gaming PC deals here👈

1. Best gaming laptop: Razer Blade 16
2. Best gaming PC: HP Omen 35L
3. Best handheld gaming PC: Lenovo Legion Go S SteamOS ed.
4. Best mini PC: Minisforum AtomMan G7 PT
5. Best VR headset: Meta Quest 3
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

Nick, gaming, and computers all first met in the early 1980s. After leaving university, he became a physics and IT teacher and started writing about tech in the late 1990s. That resulted in him working with MadOnion to write the help files for 3DMark and PCMark. After a short stint working at Beyond3D.com, Nick joined Futuremark (MadOnion rebranded) full-time, as editor-in-chief for its PC gaming section, YouGamers. After the site shutdown, he became an engineering and computing lecturer for many years, but missed the writing bug. Cue four years at TechSpot.com covering everything and anything to do with tech and PCs. He freely admits to being far too obsessed with GPUs and open-world grindy RPGs, but who isn't these days?
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.


