Corsair's Strix Halo mini PC will set you back $2,300 for the top model, but boring old AI productivity is the name of the game

A promotional image of a Corsair AI Workstation 300 mini-PC against a green gradient background.
(Image credit: Corsair)

PC hardware news at the moment is flush with all things Strix Halo, AMD's beefy APU, and the latest manufacturer to enter the fray is Corsair. But rather than jamming the massive chip into a handheld device, it's gone down a mini-PC route, with homebrewed AI developers being the target market.

When we first learned of AMD's Strix Halo processors, we all assumed they would be purely for gaming, due to the size of the integrated GPU. But when they officially launched under the moniker of Ryzen AI Max, as well as getting our hands on one for testing, it was clear that AI, rather than games, would be the main focus.

AMD Strix Halo

(Image credit: AMD)

Anyway, as things currently stand, Corsair is offering three versions on its site:

The CPU side of the APUs is practically the same (the 395 is 100 MHz faster), but the iGPU in the 395 sports 25% more compute units than the 385's. Along with the doubled RAM capacity, it's clearly going to be the preferred variant for AI developers. The $700 higher price tag certainly won't put them off.

Having said that, the somewhat disappointing array of I/O ports might make them think twice. You do get two USB4 sockets (one front and rear apiece), but there are only three more USB ports and just two monitor outputs. Networking is handled by 2.5G LAN and Wi-Fi 6E, so they're not cutting-edge either. I guess you're paying $2,300 for the chip and RAM, rather than having something that offers broad connectivity options.

An ROG Flow Z13 (2025) set up on a desk with the detachable keyboard and charger.

(Image credit: Future)

As high as that price tag is, it's actually cheaper than a high-end Strix Halo laptop with the same chip, and they don't boast 128 GB of RAM. And while you could get a really good gaming PC for the same money, its graphics card won't have anywhere near as much memory to handle big AI models.

It's a niche product for a (currently) niche market, but I kinda admire Corsair for taking a punt on this, especially considering its primary market is gaming. You could certainly use the little AI Workstation 300 for a round or two of your favourite game, but you're only looking at RTX 4060 levels of performance in that aspect. For working on AI, though, you could do far worse.

Razer Blade 16 gaming laptop
Best gaming rigs 2025

👉Check out our list of guides👈

1. Best gaming laptop: Razer Blade 16

2. Best gaming PC: HP Omen 35L

3. Best handheld gaming PC: Lenovo Legion Go S SteamOS ed.

4. Best mini PC: Minisforum AtomMan G7 PT

5. Best VR headset: Meta Quest 3

TOPICS
Nick Evanson
Hardware Writer

Nick, gaming, and computers all first met in the early 1980s. After leaving university, he became a physics and IT teacher and started writing about tech in the late 1990s. That resulted in him working with MadOnion to write the help files for 3DMark and PCMark. After a short stint working at Beyond3D.com, Nick joined Futuremark (MadOnion rebranded) full-time, as editor-in-chief for its PC gaming section, YouGamers. After the site shutdown, he became an engineering and computing lecturer for many years, but missed the writing bug. Cue four years at TechSpot.com covering everything and anything to do with tech and PCs. He freely admits to being far too obsessed with GPUs and open-world grindy RPGs, but who isn't these days?

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.