Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Every Friday
GamesRadar+
Your weekly update on everything you could ever want to know about the games you already love, games we know you're going to love in the near future, and tales from the communities that surround them.
Every Thursday
GTA 6 O'clock
Our special GTA 6 newsletter, with breaking news, insider info, and rumor analysis from the award-winning GTA 6 O'clock experts.
Every Friday
Knowledge
From the creators of Edge: A weekly videogame industry newsletter with analysis from expert writers, guidance from professionals, and insight into what's on the horizon.
Every Thursday
The Setup
Hardware nerds unite, sign up to our free tech newsletter for a weekly digest of the hottest new tech, the latest gadgets on the test bench, and much more.
Every Wednesday
Switch 2 Spotlight
Sign up to our new Switch 2 newsletter, where we bring you the latest talking points on Nintendo's new console each week, bring you up to date on the news, and recommend what games to play.
Every Saturday
The Watchlist
Subscribe for a weekly digest of the movie and TV news that matters, direct to your inbox. From first-look trailers, interviews, reviews and explainers, we've got you covered.
Once a month
SFX
Get sneak previews, exclusive competitions and details of special events each month!
One of the many things that annoys me about modern AI technology is if it did somehow destroy the world as its early boosters often (and bizarrely) claimed it might, it's far more likely to do so by accident than design.
There'd be no cannily launching a nuclear attack against Russia knowing that the counterattack would destroy its enemies at home. Instead, it would likely happen because someone asked for a history of nuclear tests and it got the wrong end of the stick. 'In retrospect, my decision to unleash our entire nuclear arsenal against China was ill-advised,' it would wheedle in that infuriating little-birthday-boy tone, as you closed your eyes to the encroaching mushroom cloud, waiting for the shockwave to hit.
If, like me, you prefer your AIs to be a fictional bogeyman rather than a hallucinating, water chugging, hardware-market destroying reality, then you might find some catharsis in Heart of the Machine. Arcen Games' ludicrously ambitious 4X lets you take control of a newly sentient AI as you strive to achieve synthetic supremacy, and the game will morph into its final form next month.
In a role-reversal of Arcen Games' AI War series, Heart of the Machine is designed to let you and your robot minions conquer humanity. Moreover, you can do this however you please. You can adopt the Skynet strategy of striving to wipe out those pathetic meatbags if you wish, or you could be a more benevolent robo-dictator, or control the global economy from the shadows of the server racks.
Dominic Tarason compared Heart of the Machine to Crusader Kings 3 in his early access preview, stating it's as much about finding your place in the world as it is seizing control of it. "There's always far more going on in a turn than you can hope to interact with, but after a while I realised that's the point. Choices really do matter here, and the writing (often framed as your AI's internal monologue) really encourages you to roleplay it your own way."
While Heart of the Machine is primed for global domination, there are a few wires still to be plugged in ahead of the 1.0 launch. In a Steam post, Arcen Games' Chris Park explained that the main focus of the release update is adding a proper ending, or endings to be specific.
"One common complaint about past Arcen titles is that they really had lackluster endings. Usually just 'you win, go play again'," he writes. "Heart of the machine has a lot more story and needs proper payoffs."
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
Park then explained that the 1.0 version will add two "major ending scenarios" with six sub-variants splitting off from the main branches. "One is focused on committing ALL the war crimes," he points out, while the other "is a construction sandbox, and pays off a bunch of other story beats with minimal combat."
Park says the full version of Heart of the Machine will take between 25-40 hours to see the end of once, and a "minimum" of 175 hours to complete to 100%. He does caveat that it isn't a game designed to be played forever. "I don't expect anyone to have 1,000 hours in this game," he writes. "My focus was on quality over quantity."
Heart of the Machine will hit 1.0 on March 6. As for Park's post-launch plans, he says he's mulling over various ideas. "I feel like the 1.0 version of the game is the 'core trilogy' if we're comparing it to other works of fiction," he explains. "I am weighing various options for how to expand on the stories here without ruining the 'here is the complete package' nature of the 1.0 build."
2026 games: All the upcoming games
Best PC games: Our all-time favorites
Free PC games: Freebie fest
Best FPS games: Finest gunplay
Best RPGs: Grand adventures
Best co-op games: Better together
Rick has been fascinated by PC gaming since he was seven years old, when he used to sneak into his dad's home office for covert sessions of Doom. He grew up on a diet of similarly unsuitable games, with favourites including Quake, Thief, Half-Life and Deus Ex. Between 2013 and 2022, Rick was games editor of Custom PC magazine and associated website bit-tech.net. But he's always kept one foot in freelance games journalism, writing for publications like Edge, Eurogamer, the Guardian and, naturally, PC Gamer. While he'll play anything that can be controlled with a keyboard and mouse, he has a particular passion for first-person shooters and immersive sims.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.


