Epic sues Fortnite botters who filled their own maps with clankers and made off with tens of thousands of dollars

A screenshot of a fish man fromo the Fortnite Diner Tycoon trailer.
(Image credit: Epic Games / Level Unlocked)

The sheer scale of Fortnite and the money involved has meant Epic Games has to deal with a sizable contingent of ne'er-do-wells. Amusingly enough, in some cases it has pursued a strategy of crushing the cheaters in court and then making them apologise, like some sort of giant corporate stepmother. But when things start to get into the realm of cheating the system itself, and illicitly siphoning off money from the creator program, it turns out Epic's lawyers play a whole other ballgame.

Fortnite has for many years hosted user-created experiences called islands, provides a suite of tools to make their creation as easy as possible, and then pays out money to the creators of the most popular maps. There are various metrics to determine payouts: session length, player count, and whether players go on to buy anything. This isn't chump change either: Epic says it pays out millions of dollars every year to community creators.

"Defendants programmed the bot accounts to engage with Defendants’ own Fortnite Islands by using a cloud gaming service that allows users to play video games, like Fortnite, remotely," reads the filing. "Defendants worked together to create multiple Islands in an attempt to disguise their scheme by spreading the fake engagement across multiple developer accounts and Islands."

The best landing spots in Fortnite Chapter 6 Season 4.

(Image credit: Epic Games)

The lawyers now say Epic wants to recuperate the money paid out for the alleged con, and wants to protect the integrity of the creator program. "Developers trust that the time spent creating Islands will be rewarded in accordance with the Engagement Program Payout Terms, and based on how real players engage with the Islands. Defendants’ conduct undermines Epic’s relationship with developers, however, depriving legitimate developers of the full share of funds they otherwise would have received and eroding the trust Epic has built with them."

Epic further asks that the court bar both players from creating Epic accounts in future, and stops them from downloading or playing Fortnite. It even asks that these measures apply to the defendants' "heirs [and] successors." That feels incredibly unlikely, though it is somewhat funny to think about some poor kid who can't play Fortnite with his mates because daddy ran a botting ring and got caught.

iBuyPower, HyperX, Razer, Corsair products composited on a pink gradient background
Top Oct Prime Day deals
Rich Stanton
Senior Editor

Rich is a games journalist with 15 years' experience, beginning his career on Edge magazine before working for a wide range of outlets, including Ars Technica, Eurogamer, GamesRadar+, Gamespot, the Guardian, IGN, the New Statesman, Polygon, and Vice. He was the editor of Kotaku UK, the UK arm of Kotaku, for three years before joining PC Gamer. He is the author of a Brief History of Video Games, a full history of the medium, which the Midwest Book Review described as "[a] must-read for serious minded game historians and curious video game connoisseurs alike."

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.