Go Back   PC Gamer Forums > Magazine and site talk

     
     
    Thread Tools Display Modes
    Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
      #9   Report Post  
    Old 01-15-2012, 02:26 PM
    JackRabbit JackRabbit is offline
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Posts: 3,563
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Red_Avatar View Post
    Did I ?

    But seriously, these Top 50 or Top 100s were always about being controversial. Heck, I remember the huge stink it caused when PC Gamer took the genius move of putting the Quake multiplayer demo (three maps) on spot 3 in the top 50 back in 1996? I believe. Loads of angry letters of how a demo could end up so high! Then the year after, the full game was at spot 1 (which now seems laughable really, considering how shitty Quake's single player mode was and how few people could play multi player at the time).

    And yeah, like I said in the blog post, I do still catch myself getting annoyed at stupid entries. I haven't read the top 100 yet but say they put Dragon Age II above real classics, it would piss me off big time - the game doesn't even deserve to get 5/10 let alone a place in the top 100 of best PC games ever considering my short list of favorite games is many times longer than that.
    To be honest, I don't think anyone over the age of about 12 really cares what someone else rates as "the best 100 games ever", but what is the point of a games forum if people don't actually talk about it!! (but yeh, Dragon age II is, apparently, "better"than Grim Fandango!)
    Reply With Quote
     

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off

    Forum Jump