Why Artifact failed to take off, according to designer Richard Garfield
'Pay-to-win' wasn't the main problem.
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Every Friday
GamesRadar+
Your weekly update on everything you could ever want to know about the games you already love, games we know you're going to love in the near future, and tales from the communities that surround them.
Every Thursday
GTA 6 O'clock
Our special GTA 6 newsletter, with breaking news, insider info, and rumor analysis from the award-winning GTA 6 O'clock experts.
Every Friday
Knowledge
From the creators of Edge: A weekly videogame industry newsletter with analysis from expert writers, guidance from professionals, and insight into what's on the horizon.
Every Thursday
The Setup
Hardware nerds unite, sign up to our free tech newsletter for a weekly digest of the hottest new tech, the latest gadgets on the test bench, and much more.
Every Wednesday
Switch 2 Spotlight
Sign up to our new Switch 2 newsletter, where we bring you the latest talking points on Nintendo's new console each week, bring you up to date on the news, and recommend what games to play.
Every Saturday
The Watchlist
Subscribe for a weekly digest of the movie and TV news that matters, direct to your inbox. From first-look trailers, interviews, reviews and explainers, we've got you covered.
Once a month
SFX
Get sneak previews, exclusive competitions and details of special events each month!
Artifact and Magic: The Gathering designer Richard Garfield believes the term "pay-to-win" is a "sloppy" way to describe games, particularly Artifact. Garfield and 3 Donkeys design partner Skaff Elias shared some thoughts about Artifact's design intent and its poor reception in a recent interview with Win.gg.
"To me, there are two important parts of pay-to-win," Garfield said, explaining that one key element is whether buying additional components of a game can actually make you a better competitor. "This is not true for Hearthstone, Magic, or for that matter, golf."
Still, Elias concedes that even if their game isn't technically pay-to-win, that doesn't mean players can't find elements of the revenue system "disagreeable," and working out what that is and how to fix it is the developer's responsibility.
The other consideration when thinking about whether a game is pay-to-win, Garfield said, is the raw cost. In the case of Artifact, top-level decks cost less than their equivalents in either Hearthstone or Magic: The Gathering.
That's certainly true now, as the total cost for a complete collection of Artifact cards is floating around $44, and that's thanks to Steam's card marketplace becoming something of a wasteland as players have largely abandoned the game (its peak players in the last 30 days numbers at 234, down from December's 46,000+).
"Of course the response was disappointing," Elias said. "You can test the gameplay, but you can't really test how the revenue model will be taken, how the social structures will form, how media will pick it up, what the fan narrative may be, what your competition is doing, etc."
Garfield said Artifact was hurt by rating-bombing, and that may have been sparked by a lack of short-term goals for players when they first started playing—things like missions or achievements beyond the initial tutorial.
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
Garfield and Elias have both moved on to new projects after their contracts with Valve ended earlier this year. They're not in touch with the current Artifact team, and can only guess at what the future holds for the game.
Still, Garfield believes the design principles behind Artifact, and even its controversial revenue model, are both fair and solid enough to support a thriving playerbase. But the game needs players to be viable.
"I believe it's a high quality game that offers something very different than what's already out there," he said. "I think the team has an excellent story, if they can figure out how to share it with the right audience."

