RX 7900 XTX finally appears in new Steam hardware survey but AMD's overall market share is still horrible
Less than 10% of Steam gamers polled use an AMD graphics card.
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Every Friday
GamesRadar+
Your weekly update on everything you could ever want to know about the games you already love, games we know you're going to love in the near future, and tales from the communities that surround them.
Every Thursday
GTA 6 O'clock
Our special GTA 6 newsletter, with breaking news, insider info, and rumor analysis from the award-winning GTA 6 O'clock experts.
Every Friday
Knowledge
From the creators of Edge: A weekly videogame industry newsletter with analysis from expert writers, guidance from professionals, and insight into what's on the horizon.
Every Thursday
The Setup
Hardware nerds unite, sign up to our free tech newsletter for a weekly digest of the hottest new tech, the latest gadgets on the test bench, and much more.
Every Wednesday
Switch 2 Spotlight
Sign up to our new Switch 2 newsletter, where we bring you the latest talking points on Nintendo's new console each week, bring you up to date on the news, and recommend what games to play.
Every Saturday
The Watchlist
Subscribe for a weekly digest of the movie and TV news that matters, direct to your inbox. From first-look trailers, interviews, reviews and explainers, we've got you covered.
Once a month
SFX
Get sneak previews, exclusive competitions and details of special events each month!
Give it up for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. Nearly nine months since the new RDNA 3 graphics architecture was announced, the RX 7900 XTX is the first example of GPU based on AMD's latest graphics tech to appear in Valve's survey of Steam users.
If that's the good news for AMD, the bad is that its graphics cards make up just 8.68% of Steam gamers. Ouch. Of course, some caveats apply. For starters, that's AMD discrete GPUs excluding integrated GPUs such as that found in the Steam Deck and AMD's APUs.
Moreover, fully 10.69% of all GPUs, including discrete and integrated, fall into a generic "Other" category. Likely, that's a mixed bag of unidentified graphics cards and iGPUs, plus those with such tiny market share, Valve doesn't bother to list them.
But assuming AMD's share of that 10-ish percent "Other" category is similar to its share of specified GPUs, AMD's overall footprint will still be only 10% at best. Nvidia, meanwhile has a roughly 75% slice of Steam-registered graphics cards, while integrated GPUs from both Intel and AMD make up the remainder.
And, yes, that means Intel's Arc graphics cards do not appear at all in the survey and presumably fall into that too-small-to-be-listed "Other" catch-all category.
Incidentally, the Van Gogh GPU, otherwise known as the built-in AMD graphics in Valve's Steam Deck is now the third most popular AMD GPU in the list, behind a generic "AMD Radeon Graphics" entry at the top, which is likely integrated GPUs, and the Radeon RX 580 in at number two.
Best CPU for gaming: The top chips from Intel and AMD
Best gaming motherboard: The right boards
Best graphics card: Your perfect pixel-pusher awaits
Best SSD for gaming: Get into the game ahead of the rest
For the record, the Steam Deck makes up 0.82% of Steam gamers. That doesn't sound like a lot superficially, but it actually implies a decent number of Decks when you consider that Steam has somewhere between 100 and 150 million monthly users.
Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.
Of course, the Steam survey has never been a fully adjusted and controlled survey. It relies on Steam gamers opting in and hardware being correctly identified. For sure, the survey has suffered from some fairly obvious anomalies in the past, such as the RTX 3060 suddenly jumping up to 10% of users in April before returning to a more plausible 4.66% in May.
But provided you understand its limitations and the context around the numbers, it's still a very useful guide to what hardware gamers use. And it does not make for good reading for AMD.

Jeremy has been writing about technology and PCs since the 90nm Netburst era (Google it!) and enjoys nothing more than a serious dissertation on the finer points of monitor input lag and overshoot followed by a forensic examination of advanced lithography. Or maybe he just likes machines that go “ping!” He also has a thing for tennis and cars.

