Yes, Intel has released the fastest gaming CPU ever for $699 and no, you don't need it

Intel Core i9 13900K Raptor Lake chip on a promotional box
(Image credit: Intel)

This announcement has been a long time coming: The Intel Core i9 13900KS is launching today—January 12—for $699. The processor has been teased and talked about plenty over the past few months, but the world's first-ever 6GHz desktop processor at stock speeds actually launches today.

Yes, a chip formally announced and launched on the same day—you don't see that much these days. This high-performance processor hopes to be the be-all and end-all of gaming performance and is capable of hitting a 6GHz Max Turbo clock out of the box. Earlier this week Intel showed off the chip in action with a glimpse of the CPU running up to 6GHz. Granted, it's not sticking at that lofty clock speed for long, but that's generally the case for all CPUs nowadays.

A 6GHz processor is absolutely awesome. But even Intel must know how incredibly niche this sort of chip is. With the Core i9 13900K running up to 5.8GHz, and even that processor being mostly overkill for everything but the most intensive professional creation workloads, I do wonder why anyone might feel the need to pay an extra $100 for the 200MHz faster Core i9 13900KS. (Okay, I know the answer: big numbers are fun).

Binned chips that hit these sorts of turbo speeds have been gradually becoming less and less appealing over the years. The so-called golden chips you might have found a decade ago, capable of running whole gigahertz faster than their mundane siblings, are long gone. You're looking at a couple hundred megahertz out of a near-perfect die nowadays, at least without liquid nitrogen. You can get a lot more out of a CPU by dousing it in the stuff, the Core i9 13900K makes it up to 9GHz, but we're very much out of the realms of your everyday user there.

Intel, AMD, they're all pushing the limits of new chips from the get-go. The rare 'golden samples' are skimmed off the top to be sold as more premium offerings, such as this Core i9 13900KS, so the silicon lottery isn't quite as exciting for hobbyist overclockers. It's actually for this reason that the binned CPU store, Silicon Lottery, shuttered last year. "Overclocking headroom has been dwindling," the store said on the day of its closing.

Process node development has also slowed over the years, meaning material gains for clock speed are a matter of pushing for more out of pre-existing nodes, which is what Intel has been doing for a couple of generations now.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Intel Raptor Lake Core i9 13900KS versus Core i9 13900K
Header Cell - Column 0 Core i9 13900KSCore i9 13900K
Cores (P+E) / threads8+16 / 328+16 / 32
L3 cache36MB36MB
L2 cache32MB32MB
P-core Turbo clock6GHz5.8GHz
GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 770
Total CPU PCIe lanes2020
Max memory speedDDR5 5600, DDR4 3200DDR5 5600, DDR4 3200
Recommended Customer Pricing (RCP)$699$589–$599
Your next upgrade

(Image credit: Future)

Best CPU for gaming: The top chips from Intel and AMD
Best gaming motherboard: The right boards
Best graphics card: Your perfect pixel-pusher awaits
Best SSD for gaming: Get into the game ahead of the rest

All of which makes a chip like the Intel Core i9 13900KS tough to recommend. Like I say, it's genuinely such an awesome milestone to see a CPU at 6GHz out-of-the-box, but no gamer is really going to benefit from its slightly speedier cores. For avid overclockers you could make a case for this being a somewhat 'cheap' binned chip, but even then you're paying for the glory of saying you have one more than anything else. 

Nevertheless, Intel hopes the Core i9 13900KS will be able to stave off any challenge from AMD's new and much improved 3D V-Cache Ryzen 7000-series processors. From the rough performance figures given by AMD, it would seem like AMD might have the edge—though there's not much specificity in the graphs offered so far.

We'll have to wait for a chip-versus-chip showdown to get the whole picture—we had thought AMD's 3D V-Cache release date was set for February 14, but that date turned out to be incorrect. AMD hasn't offered any replacement date for when we can instead expect its next-gen gaming processors, but it's likely to be sometime in Q1. Or at least I hope so. 

Jacob Ridley
Senior Hardware Editor

Jacob earned his first byline writing for his own tech blog. From there, he graduated to professionally breaking things as hardware writer at PCGamesN, and would go on to run the team as hardware editor. Since then he's joined PC Gamer's top staff as senior hardware editor, where he spends his days reporting on the latest developments in the technology and gaming industries and testing the newest PC components.