Breaking news: AMD has revealed specifications and pricing for the RX Vega lineup, due to launch on August 14. Pricing is $499 for the Vega 64 and $399 for the Vega 56, which will compete against Nvidia's GTX 1080 and 1070, respectively. Unfortunately, power draw will be significantly higher (295W for the Vega 64, 210W for the Vega 56), so unless performance ends up better than we expect, Nvidia's GTX 1080 Ti, GTX 1080, and GTX 1070 will still come out ahead. Stay tuned for the full review.
The CPU may be the brain of your PC, but when it comes to gaming, the graphics card is the beating heart that pumps pixels out of your obelisk of a tower and into your monitor. A graphics card consists of dedicated video memory and a graphics processing unit (GPU) that handles all sorts of calculations, like mapping textures and lighting surfaces while rendering millions of polygons. Simply put, the graphics card is the most vital component of your gaming PC. We've sifted through the current options and picked out the ones that are worthy of going in your next PC, whether it's a savvy middle-of-the-road build, a budget rig, or a 4K monster.
Nvidia has now launched all of its 10-series parts, from the pixel smashing GTX 1080 Ti, to the now-reduced-price GTX 1080, along with the GTX 1070, GTX 1060 (with a 3GB model as well), and wrapping up with the budget-friendly GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1050. There's also the new Titan Xp, which replaces the Titan X (Pascal) as the absolute fastest card (but it's not even remotely worth the small price increase over the 1080 Ti). As for the earlier Nvidia GPUs, all the 900-series parts show significant price increases since 2016 and are no longer worth buying (though you don't need to upgrade if you're still using one).
- Check out this week's best graphics card deals
AMD has revamped its GPU lineup as well, replacing the 400-series cards with new 500-series parts. All of the 400-series and 500-series use AMD's Polaris architecture, and more recently, AMD gave us some of the details on the upcoming Vega architecture a while ago, and as noted above, the final specs for the RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 are out. The RX 580 and RX 570 represent very small performance increases over the outgoing 480 and 470, particularly if you're looking at factory overclocked models. The 560 is a bigger improvement over the 460, but still clearly a budget card.
The big news right now is cryptocurrency fever, with Bitcoin and Ethereum prices shooting up over the past few months. The result is that pricing and availability of AMD's Polaris GPUs are horrible, and Nvidia GPUs are at inflated prices as well. I won't dig into the mining aspects too much, but the result is that finding a good mainstream priced GPU right now is very difficult. And if it's anything like late 2013, it may be a while before that changes. I've altered a couple of picks due to the pricing on other cards, and will continue to monitor the situation. In the meantime, here are the best graphics cards for gaming.
Games are rarely bottlenecked by your CPU, but dozens of games every year will push your graphics card to its limits. It's the component you'll want to upgrade most frequently (though if you buy the right card, it should last you at least two years). For gaming systems, it's also likely the most expensive part in your build. On a practical budget, it's critical to find the graphics card with the best ratio of price to performance. That's why we've previously looked at cards in the $300/£250 range, though that's a no-man's-land right now thanks to crypto mining.
For raw performance, Nvidia's GTX 1080 is a killer card, easily outperforming all older cards, and prices have only gone down since the launch. It's overclockable, quiet, and efficient; more importantly, it's able to run every game we've tested at more than 60 frames per second at 1080p Ultra, and most games break 60 fps at 1440p Ultra. You can argue about price and whether or not you really need Ultra quality settings, but right now, the GTX 1080 is the best graphics card for the demanding gamer in all of us.
While the GTX 1080 is the card we'd recommend to most—but not all—PC gamers, that's primarily due to scarcity and pricing on the mainstream offerings. The GTX 1070 only costs about 10 percent less right now, but it's over 20 percent slower. Meanwhile the GTX 1060 6GB is a bit too slow in some games, particularly if you have a 1440p display. But if you can wait, the 1070 should return to its $350 MSRP in the coming months and reclaim our primary recommendation.
Testing graphics cards
Our graphics card recommendations are based on our own benchmarks and testing, as well as research into the reviews and testing done by other sites. Along with Maximum PC, we have benchmark data for the complete range of Nvidia and AMD graphics cards, including the GTX 1000/900 series and AMD RX 400/R9 300 and R9 Fury/Nano cards. We've previously looked at earlier cards like the R9 200 and GTX 700, though we've stopped testing those with newer releases. Basically, subtract about 10 points from the model number for each generation, so GTX 770 is roughly equal to a GTX 960, or the still older GTX 680. (No, that's not a perfect estimate, but it's at least relatively close; some models do better than others.)
What makes the best graphics card? For PC gamers, it's a balance of price and performance. The graphics card must be able to run demanding games at high framerates and settings, with 1920x1080 being the most common resolution. However, we also test at 2560x1440 and 4K, which are becoming increasingly popular choices, particularly at the high-end. The best graphics card shouldn't cost more than other cards with comparable performance, and the card should be fast enough to still perform respectably two years later, even if it can't run everything at max settings.
Graphics performance isn't the only consideration. The quality of game drivers and other features supported by the card are important. The card's noise level, power draw, and temperature matter, too. Thankfully, nearly all of the cards run fairly quiet, even under load, and temperatures are within the acceptable range as well—though Nvidia still has an advantage when it comes to power.
From a high level, we tested each card on a high-end PC (4.2GHz overclocked i7-5930K), at 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra, and 4K with ultra/high settings (depending on the game). We include results from fifteen games, mostly newer releases, using the 'best' API for each GPU on each game. That means low-level APIs are mostly used for AMD cards, while DX12/Vulkan are only used in certain games for Nvidia cards.
Here's how the cards stack up in terms of average and minimum frame rates across these games. You can see individual game charts including most of these GPUs in our GTX 1050 Ti review.
The Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti, GTX 1080, and GTX 1070 are the three fastest graphics cards, often by a rather large margin. The RX 570/580 and GTX 1060 3GB/6GB deliver good performance as well, though the current value proposition for AMD GPUs is severely warped thanks to Bitcoin/Ethereum.
For those who can't afford to spend that much money, the bottom of the chart still holds some compelling options, but right now it's difficult to recommend most midrange cards. Here's a different look at all of the cards we tested, this time rating them in terms of value—FPS for money spent. (Note: I've included 'used' pricing on some of the older cards, like Nvidia's 900 series and AMD's 300 series.)
Other than the RX 460 (and 560 if I were to test it), you can see the problem with AMD supply/demand right now. The top of the value charts are dominated by Nvidia GPUs, and even the 1080 Ti represents a better 'value' than some of the popular mining cards like the RX 480. Ouch.
These charts have changed radically since earlier this year, where the 470/480, 570/580, and 1060 3GB/6GB were near the top of the charts. Give it time, and they'll likely return to that spot (assuming a newer GPU doesn't supplant them).
Just remember that while value is important, the above charts show a skewed view of things. FPS per dollar/pound sounds like a reasonable measurement, but you also need to consider your current hardware, and how much performance you really want. If you're looking to game on a 1440p display, the excellent 'value' of a GTX 1060 3GB doesn't matter much when it typically falls well short of 60 fps.
Wrapping it up
Looking forward, the computer graphics world is a fast-changing field, and AMD's RX Vega is finally set to appear next month. It will be the first truly top-tier AMD GPU since the R9 Fury X launched in 2015, though we still need to see how it performs.
If you find your current system isn't keeping up with the gaming times, look at the performance charts and decide how far up the ladder you're looking to climb, then buy accordingly. Those who already own an R9 300 or GTX 900 series card should be safe for the time being, and while games continue to push for new levels of performance, tuning a few settings should keep most graphics cards viable for at least a few years.
Some online stores give us a small cut if you buy something through one of our links. Read our affiliate policy for more info.