Skip to main content

Judge puts Epic's App Store win against Apple on hold

Apple Man
(Image credit: Epic Games)
Audio player loading…

Epic Games landed a good shot on Apple in September: Most of the ruling in the Epic v Apple case went Apple's way, but the court also declared that Apple requiring iOS developers to use its built-in payment processing system was in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. As a result, Apple was given 90 days to enable third-party payment processors on the App Store.

Epic quickly appealed the ruling, and Apple did too, although not before taking a little time to blacklist Epic by refusing to restore its developer account until all appeals are exhausted and the judgment in the matter "becomes final and nonappealable." Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said after the ruling that the appeals process could take five years to fully wind out.

From September:

See more

Today Apple scored a win of its own in that process, as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted its request to stay the order requiring it to allow third-party payment systems on the site until the appeals process is completed. In other words, Apple's tightly controlled App Store payment rules can remain in place for now.

"Apple has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court's determination that Epic Games Inc. failed to show Apple's conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California's Unfair Competition Law," the ruling (via The Verge) states.

"If the same conduct is alleged to be both and antitrust violation and an 'unfair' business act or practice for the same reason—because it unreasonably restrains competition and harms consumers—the determination that the conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade necessarily implies that the conduct is not 'unfair' toward consumers."

That question takes square aim at the September ruling, which determined that Apple is not in violation of antitrust laws, but is in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. Apple also sufficiently demonstrated that it will suffer irreparable harm if the order to allow third-party processors is enforced before the case is finally settled.

The stay will remain in effect until the appeals filed by both sides are fully heard. I've reached out to Apple and Epic for more information and will update if I receive a reply.

Andy has been gaming on PCs from the very beginning, starting as a youngster with text adventures and primitive action games on a cassette-based TRS80. From there he graduated to the glory days of Sierra Online adventures and Microprose sims, ran a local BBS, learned how to build PCs, and developed a longstanding love of RPGs, immersive sims, and shooters. He began writing videogame news in 2007 for The Escapist and somehow managed to avoid getting fired until 2014, when he joined the storied ranks of PC Gamer. He covers all aspects of the industry, from new game announcements and patch notes to legal disputes, Twitch beefs, esports, and Henry Cavill. Lots of Henry Cavill.