Intel has provided an expanded set of benchmarks that compare the performance of several generations of processors before and after applying Meltdown and Spectre security patches. In doing so, Intel stands by its previous claim that users can generally expect a six percent performance penalty or less, though in some cases the numbers show it could be much higher.
The most alarming benchmark result from Intel's own numbers is a 21 percent hit on a Core i7-6700K processor, which was also paired with an SSD in Windows 10. It stands out as the biggest penalty of the bunch, though to be fair, it happened in an individual test in Sysmark 2014 SE—the overall drop in that benchmark checks in at eight percent.
Here's a look at all of the numbers Intel shared:
The particular test that spanked the Core i7-6700K also proved troublesome for every other processor in Windows 10, though interestingly it actually ran a little faster in Windows 7 on an HDD after applying the security patches.
"We previously said that we expected our performance impact should not be significant for average computer users, and the data we are sharing today support that expectation on these platforms," Intel said.
The good news for gamers is that Intel doesn't expect the security updates to do much damage. "Workloads that are graphics-intensive like gaming or compute-intensive like financial analysis see minimal impact," Intel added.
The numbers Intel shared are fairly limited in scope, in terms of the number of platforms tested. Specifically, all of the 6th, 7th, and 8th generation processors tested share the same base 14nm Skylake architecture, and indications are that Broadwell and older generation Intel CPUs may be harder hit. However, Intel says it's in the process of collecting more data from a broad range of usages and platforms that were launched in the past five years, both mobile and desktop. The company expects to share that data within the week.