It's just the two of us: me and my companion, a real-life infantry lieutenant. He's in full-on Army Officer Mode—every few seconds, I'm briefed on the proper way to breach a room or clear a hallway, and I'm a little surprised when it works perfectly. Whenever an enemy comes rushing through a doorway, we're already watching and take him down easily. Carefully, we kill our way through the sprawling Iraqi ministry building full of AI enemies to bask in our tactical victory.
Insurgency is defined less by the reality it occasionally worships and more by the features it purposely lacks. There is no enemy damage notification, no ammo count, and no danger direction indicator. Though you can track how many magazines you have, you can't know how many bullets you've got until reload unless you've been counting your shots. One or two hits to center-mass will take you down, and no health packs or recharging shields will rescue you from death.
All of the flashing lights and bells that I'm so used to relying on in first-person shooters are absent, and the resulting game is slower and more intense—if you're willing to play along. The truth about tactical simulations, from Rainbow Six to Arma , is that there's usually a bit of roleplaying required. That makes Insurgency really two games: the one you play with friends and the one you play with everyone else. Our small group is in voice chat, constantly communicating, a small, professional pack on the prowl. As soon as more players join the server, they sprint ahead to grab kills and rack up points. The larger a team is, the more disposable its individual members become, and reckless behavior isn't as brutally punished. In a smaller game, charging to your death in exchange for one or two kills would be disastrous for your friends. In large battles with random players, this behavior is practically encouraged; you just need to wait until your next respawn to do it again, earning points for your team as you go.
It's during large battles that bits of twitch gameplay start to creep through the tactical facade, and Insurgency feels more like modded Counter-Strike than reborn Rainbow Six. An in-game economy of supply points unlocks different weapons, add-ons, and ammunition types, and you gain points when you make kills or capture points. Playing as a support soldier putting down covering fire goes unrewarded, and it is the rush to earn kills that drives the run-and-gun players I see online. If a game is truly tactical, it should reward teamplay and communication, not scalp collection. I'd like to see the supply-point economy adjusted before launch.
That said, it's to Insurgency's immense credit that even when it feels like little more than a hard-mode Counter-Strike, it's a version of Counter-Strike that's still great fun. Once the game hits a finished release and the player and server population grows, I have no doubt that custom servers with hardcore roleplayers will pop up and wage large-scale PvP war without sacrificing the pacing and realism that makes Insurgency so special.
