Guild Wars 2

Guild Wars 2 review

Chris Thursten at

Welcome to Lion's Arch. Here's the lion.

ArenaNet have built a cooperative model that superficially reflects what has come before – you’re still filling progress bars – but reworked it to support a different psychology of play. More adventure, fewer boxes to tick – and it works! Unfortunately, it isn’t enough to stop many players from wanting to stay in one place to tick boxes, and a lack of participation can leave those players feeling underleveled, particularly if they’re determined to endlessly rush on to the next step in their ongoing personal story chain.

At this point it usually falls to local chat to point out that you could be crafting, or playing world vs world PvP, or just climbing that hill over there, and that any of these things will earn you the experience you need by the dopamine trigger-load. The game desperately tries to teach these things, but it uses dismissible tool-tips and mouse-over explanations that no one in the history of computers has ever actually read. The experience can be overwhelming, both for players who don’t get it and for those who do and don’t understand why other players keep complaining. There are features in place to solve these problems, but the game could do more to tackle them.

These issues are defensible because they result from innovations that make the MMORPG fresh and enjoyable in a way that it hasn’t been for years. Second, and perhaps more importantly, they come from an attitude to game-making that seems to think more of its players than other games do. Guild Wars 2 expects you to want to charge off and help a villager – or to discover new items in its experimentation-based crafting system, or to leap into player vs player – because it assumes that you’ve got an active interest in playing and an inherent ability to excel. Its core design casts you in a flattering light, and as such it stands in stark contrast with MMOs that’ll crown you God-Emperor of the Universe if that’ll get you to shut up and get back into the machine.

Some elementalists just want to watch the world burn. Wait, no. All elementalists.

This is why the lack of a subscription fee is such a masterstroke. Just as Guild Wars 2 takes apart the mechanical absurdities of its genre, it strikes a killing blow to the old business model. Players have come to expect that you need to pick a pocket or two if you’re going to finance a game like this, and Guild Wars 2’s rejection of that assumption should be the moment that we finally see the idea for the anachronism it is. By being free beyond an initial purchase – which frankly makes it one of the best value propositions in gaming at the moment – Guild Wars 2 suggests, quietly, that you should rethink your policy vis-à-vis recurring hammer blows to the face.

There have been a few teething problems at launch. The game’s overflow server system means you can almost always get into the game, but you may find yourself in a separate shard to your friends, and it can be difficult to group up. Support systems such as guild chat, the auction-house-style trading post, and the in-game store are sometimes down. World vs world PvP queues can be lengthy.

These are the chief frustrations in a game that is otherwise remarkable in its comprehensive attention to the player’s urges, and when they’re solved then there’ll be very little that Guild Wars 2 does not do as well if not better than its contemporaries. PvP on both large and small scales, freeform cooperative roaming and tight, focused group play. Branching storylines for each race that never stray far from the fantasy wheelhouse but manage to be packed with enjoyable characters and variously funny and dramatic set-pieces. It’s all here, on day one.

World vs. world makes a brisk trade in heroic defense sequences.

ArenaNet seem to have wilfully ignored the fact that gamers have, over the last decade, segregated themselves into camps: PvPers and PvEers, hardcore and casual. GW2 wants you to be a generalist. Overcommit to a single part and the experience suffers: you’ll either burn out on chasing down vistas, grow weary of competing over the same four PvP maps, or lag behind the levelling curve of your personal story. The experience suffers when the pace falters, but it’s a solvable problem. You can always do something else.

Whether you consider Guild Wars 2 revolutionary depends and, appropriately, it depends on you. If you’ll accept nothing less than the fall of the house of Warcraft, then no. If you’ll accept nothing less than EVE’s green light, the player-driven persistent world that seems to get further away every year – then no. Guild Wars 2 isn’t chasing a single vision. It’s pluralistic and the pointed critical thought apparent in each of its component parts belies a whole that is smooth to the touch. Trying to impress upon someone why Guild Wars 2 is important is like trying to stab them with the sharp end of a ball. The temptation is to bludgeon.

It’s important, ultimately, because of that pluralism, the collective egoless talent on display. In losing the monthly fee ArenaNet have given themselves the freedom to excise the MMORPG’s accreted dross: the subscription-prolonging treadmill, the trickle-down economics of fun that says that only your elites have paid enough to get to see the cool dragon. Then, that spirit of change has passed through every other assumption that MMOs make about themselves and their players and touched each in turn. Nothing is ever so fixed that it shouldn’t be broken and remade. It’s not perfect, but it is ideologically and structurally sound in a way that few MMORPGs manage at launch, if ever.

Guild Wars 2 is not a revolution, but it is a call to arms. Tomorrow’s MMORPGs will be held to account against its standards: generosity, variety, and respect for the player’s ability and time. Of course, by that point, it won’t be Guild Wars 2 waving the banner. It’s not a revolution. It just quietly suggests that we start one.



An accomplished and rewarding online RPG that does a great deal to reclaim the promise of its genre.

Editors Award