the game has 7 reviews ranging from 8.7-9.0
and 1 review scoring 6.2, from a reviewer so obviously biased..
TF is just brutally punishing the game because it's not exactly the same as BM.. He's barely even talked about the game mechanics/how they stack up against other stealth games at large... he's just compared it to BM (and nothing else), got incredibly butthurt because it's not BM, and given the game a shit score.
No way in hell is this game worse than K&L 1&2.. But apparently it is, because it's not BM..
The score seems to reflect Tom's view on the new direction for the franchise, as opposed to the game in itself... which given his occupation, is probably what he should have been reviewing in the first place, objectively and without obvious prejudice/butthurt.
He did the exact same thing with MP3 because it wasn't MP 1&2..
If these freaking technical issues were such a massive problem, then how on earth did he even manage to effectively review the game at 15fps?
An absolute joke, Francis reviews every single game through nostalgia goggles, if it doesn't quite fit with how he remembers the last game - shit score shit score shit score
i hate his reviews, he's easily the most biased/nostalgia blind/indie humping ponce currently working at PCG..
(fun fact: i've actually played Absolution, the review is just plain wrong)
and no, it's nothing to do with his opinion over mine, given the countless factual errors actually in the review... Also this review has even less freaking detail than some of the PREviews for the game..
and you know, in spite of the very obvious differences between this and Blood Money, this is actually a really well put together game..
Last edited by Millllls; 11-14-2012 at 01:08 AM.